The Huawei WS5200 V2 Wi-Fi speed test: meagre yield or a great deal?

  Can a router offer a strong signal for little money? What happens when a 50-buck Huawei mini router goes against professional and expensive competition? Well, time to speed test the WS5200 V2 and get some answers.

  Want to have your cake and eat it? Spend little cash on your router? Then get excited. Time to see whether the HUAWEI ws5200 new V2 makes this possible. It's simultaneously the cheapest and smallest router to ever grace our Wi-Fi speed test. Nevertheless, it has four external antennas and claims to provide up to 1200 Mbps.

  The specs:

  Processor and memory: 800 MHz dual-core processor.

  Antennas: 4 x external.

  Ports: 1 x RJ45 WAN (Gigabit), 3 x RJ45 LAN (Gigabit).

  5 GHz network standards: IEEE 802.11.ac/a/n.

  2.4 GHz network standards: IEEE 802.11a/n/b/g.

  Transmission rate: up to 1200 Mbps.

  Encryptions: WPA-PSK, WPA2-PSK.

  User modes: wireless router, access point.

  Dimensions: 205 x 120 x 36.8 mm, 239 g.

  Operation: HiLink Button, Reset Button.

  Features: MU-MIMO, Firewall, Anti-brute force algorithms, DoS attack protection, DMZ, PAP / CHAP, VPN pass through, Wi-Fi timer, Guest Wi-Fi and more.

  Apartment floor plan and router location

  To accurately compare the small Huawei router with the competition tested so far, I place it in the standard location of my 120 m² maisonette. The current champion is the Ubiquiti UniFi Dream Machine. The Dream Machine averages 453.09 Mbps in my apartment, has a latency of 3 ms and a signal strength of -65 dBm.

  Upstairs.

  Getting set up

  The router weighs only 239 g, measures 20.5 x 12 cm and has a design that slopes from back to front. At the very back, it's only 3.7 cm thick with antennas closed. 1.2 cm at the front. It has one WAN and three LAN ports as well as two buttons. The HiLink Button for connecting Wi-Fi devices and a reset button.

  Network connection, RJ45 WAN (Gigabit), 3 x RJ45 LAN (Gigabit), reset button

  Initial setup of the router is relatively simple and works as follows:

  Connect a PC or other terminal device to the router via a LAN cable or Wi-Fi. The router has an open WLAN, the SSID is on a sticker attached to the bottom of the router. When connecting to a smartphone, setup is automatically called up. On PC, this is done by entering the IP address 192.168.3.1 in your browser (also noted on the sticker).

  Follow the setup: accept the license agreement and determine whether updates of the router software should be done automatically.

  Define the WLAN name and password and select whether the 5 GHz and 2.4 GHz frequency bands should be operated separately or together.

  Set a password for the administrator account.

  Perform network configuration automatically or manually.

  The web interface and other router settings are best accessed from your desktop computer. This is again done by entering the router's IP 192.168.3.1 into the browser.

  If the IP address indicated on the sticker does not lead to your destination, you can determine the correct IP by starting Explorer on a Windows PC, for example. Then click on Network and wait until the router appears. Then right-click on it and select Properties. The IP is now displayed at the very bottom of the properties.

  Speed, ping and signal strength per room

  Armed with an Asus ZenBook Duo, I start measuring the new Wi-Fi. I measured the new installation with a Wi-Fi-6-capable notebook and the «LAN Speed Test» app. I uploaded a 1 GB file to my NAS (article in German), which is located in the living room, three times in total. Then I determined the latency of the DOS console by pinging my NAS. For the signal strength, which is specified in decibel milliwatts (dBm), I used the «NetSpot» software. The heat maps further down were also provided by NetSpot.

  Results

  How the Huawei WS5200 V2 fares in our Wi-Fi speed test:

  Location5 Ghz frequency speed / ping / signal strength2.4 Ghz frequency speed / ping / signal strength

  Entrance hall131,27 Mbps / 3 ms / -74 dBm139,04 Mbps / 3 ms / -69 dBm

  Living room318,53 Mbps / 3 ms / -50 dBm168,96 Mbps / 3 ms / -39 dBm

  Dining room229,92 Mbps / 3 ms / -68 dBm155,50 Mbps / 3 ms / -59 dBm

  Kitchen146,69 Mbps / 3 ms / -67 dBm141,29 Mbps / 3 ms / -58 dBm

  Balcony92,48 Mbps / 4 ms / -79 dBm94,07 Mbps / 5 ms / -73 dBm

  Broom closet82,24 Mbps / 4 ms / -76 dBm110,48 Mbps / 3 ms / -72 dBm

  Bathroom276,16 Mbps / 3 ms / -63 dBm167,93 Mbps / 3 ms / -59 dBm

  Office51,21 Mbps / 5 ms / -81 dBm58,51 Mbps / 5 ms / -77 dBm

  Washing room57,52 Mbps / 4 ms / -84 dBm73,03 Mbps / 3 ms / -78 dBm

  Upstairs bathroom45,65 Mbps / 5 ms / -86 dBm60,92 Mbps / 4 ms / -76 dBm

  Bedroom52,09 Mbps / 5 ms / -82 dBm67,68 Mbps / 4 ms / -77 dBm

  Ø134,88 Mbps / 4 ms / -74 dBm112,49 Mbps / 4 ms / -67 dBm

  What's particularly exciting about these measurements and results is that the two frequency bands are engaged in an internal duel which, taken as a whole, detracts from the 5 GHz frequencies. The 2.4 GHz frequency band offers better performance in the entrance area, storage room, office and the entire upper floor. This could be an indication that Huawei divides the antenna power of this router equally between both frequency bands. As in theory, the 2.4 GHz frequency band reaches farther with this router.

  An average of 112.49 Mbps and a latency of 4 ms at 2.4 GHz sounds good at first. However, the average signal strength of -67 dBm for 2.4 GHz conditions in this apartment is somewhat high. This means that in distant corners of the flat, many overlapping neighbourhood WLANs could cause jerking or signal loss. By the way, you can see that on the heat maps below.

  The performance of the 5 GHz frequency band is not good. Signal strength and data throughput drop too quickly.

  5 GHz heat map

  The lower the measured dBm value, the worse the signal strength and the more blue the colour.

  5 GHz signal level.

  5 GHz signal level on the upper floor.

  2.4 GHz heat map

  The 2.4 GHz frequency band has a higher range, but lower speeds.

  2.4 GHz signal level.

  2.4 GHz signal level on the upper floor.

  Comparing with the competition

  All routers tested so far were clearly more expensive than this router. The two products listed in the tables below have performed best in my Wi-Fi speed tests so far. When comparing values, keep in mind that these two routers cost about six times as much as the Huawei router.

  The 5 GHz comparison:

  LocationHuawei WS5200 V2 (Wi-Fi 5)Ubiquiti UniFi Dream Machine (Wi-Fi 5)TP-Link Archer AX6000 (Wi-Fi 6)

  Entrance hall131,27 Mbps / 3 ms / -74 dBm470,40 Mbps / 3 ms / -66 dBm457,23 Mbps / 3 ms / -62 dBm

  Living room318,53 Mbps / 3 ms / -50 dBm603,20 Mbps / 2 ms / -44 dBm545,69 Mbps / 2 ms / -44 dBm

  Dining room229,92 Mbps / 3 ms / -68 dBm586,40 Mbps / 3 ms / -61 dBm486,73 Mbps / 3 ms / -50 dBm

  Kitchen146,69 Mbps / 3 ms / -67 dBm548,00 Mbps / 3 ms / -60 dBm479,59 Mbps / 3 ms / -57 dBm

  Balcony92,48 Mbps / 4 ms / -79 dBm451,20 Mbps / 3 ms / -71 dBm434,88 Mbps / 3 ms / -68 dBm

  Broom closet82,24 Mbps / 4 ms / -76 dBm409,60 Mbps / 4 ms / -64 dBm429,07 Mbps / 4 ms / -64 dBm

  Bathroom276,16 Mbps / 3 ms / -63 dBm597,60 Mbps / 3 ms / -50 dBm476,04 Mbps / 3 ms / -49 dBm

  Office51,21 Mbps / 5 ms / -81 dBm279,20 Mbps / 5 ms / -75 dBm254,51 Mbps / 4 ms / -73 dBm

  Washing room57,52 Mbps / 4 ms / -84 dBm382,40 Mbps / 4 ms / -77 dBm328,22 Mbps / 4 ms / -75 dBm

  Upstairs bathroom45,65 Mbps / 5 ms / -86 dBm373,60 Mbps / 4 ms / -70 dBm321,52 Mbps / 4 ms / -70 dBm

  Bedroom52,09 Mbps / 5 ms / -82 dBm282,40 Mbps / 4 ms / -73 dBm245,06 Mbps / 4 ms / -74 dBm

  Ø134,88 Mbps / 4 ms / -74 dBm453,09 Mbps / 3 ms / -65 dBm405,32 Mbps / 3 ms / -62 dBm

  The 2.4 GHz comparison:

  LocationHuawei WS5200 V2 (Wi-Fi 5)Ubiquiti UniFi Dream Machine (Wi-Fi 5)TP-Link Archer AX6000 (Wi-Fi 6)

  Entrance hall139,04 Mbps / 3 ms / -69 dBm48,80 Mbps / 5 ms / -63 dBm144,49 Mbps / 3 ms / -58 dBm

  Living room168,96 Mbps / 3 ms / -39 dBm88,80 Mbps / 4 ms / -42 dBm164,17 Mbps / 2 ms / -38 dBm

  Dining room155,50 Mbps / 3 ms / -59 dBm63,68 Mbps / 5 ms / -54 dBm154,99 Mbps / 3 ms / -45 dBm

  Kitchen141,29 Mbps / 3 ms / -58 dBm50,80 Mbps / 5 ms / -48 dBm151,67 Mbps / 3 ms / -51 dBm

  Balcony94,07 Mbps / 5 ms / -73 dBm41,92 Mbps / 5 ms / -64 dBm132,58 Mbps / 3 ms / -61 dBm

  Broom closet110,48 Mbps / 3 ms / -72 dBm44,32 Mbps / 6 ms / -64 dBm133,57 Mbps / 4 ms / -58 dBm

  Bathroom167,93 Mbps / 3 ms / -59 dBm85,60 Mbps / 5 ms / -54 dBm147,55 Mbps / 3 ms / -46 dBm

  Office58,51 Mbps / 5 ms / -77 dBm34,88 Mbps / 6 ms / -66 dBm125,94 Mbps / 4 ms / -67 dBm

  Washing room73,03 Mbps / 3 ms / -78 dBm33,76 Mbps / 7 ms / -68 dBm136,52 Mbps / 3 ms / -67 dBm

  Upstairs bathroom60,92 Mbps / 4 ms / -76 dBm49,84 Mbps / 5 ms / -64 dBm135,55 Mbps / 4 ms / -55 dBm

  Bedroom67,68 Mbps / 4 ms / -77 dBm43,76 Mbps / 5 ms / -61 dBm131,48 Mbps / 3 ms / -60 dBm

  Ø112,49 Mbps / 4 ms / -67 dBm53,28 Mbps / 5 ms / -59 dBm141,68 Mbps / 3 ms / -55 dBm

  Conclusion: modest performance for a small price

  The Huawei WS5200 V2 definitely doesn't offer much performance for its tiny price tag. The 5 GHz frequency band only offers satisfactory performance in the living room and dining area. In contrast, the 2.4 GHz frequency band shows comparatively good values for data throughput and latency. However, the signal strength and thus the network coverage is significantly lower than that of the competition.

  Nevertheless, this router has its right to exist. Internet users with a modest subscription and a small apartment will rejoice at this option.

  Finally, my Top 5 Wi-Fi speed test ranking, onto which the Huawei router unfortunately does not make it:

  1. The Ubiquiti UniFi Dream Machine, with an average of 453.09 Mbps, 3 ms latency and -65 dBm

  2. The TP-Link Archer AX6000, with an average 405.32 Mbps, 3 ms latency and -62 dBm.

  3. The Synology RT2600ac, with an average of 383.1 Mbps and 4 ms latency.

  4. The Netgear RAX120 Nighthawk, with an average of 336.21 Mbps and 3 ms latency (in terms of range, this router ranks third).

  5. Asus ROG Rapture GT-AC2900 with an average of 329.4 Mbps and 3 ms latency.

 

Leave A Comment